Netflix has sparked widespread criticism after its co-founder, Reed Hastings, pledged $2 million to support California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s redistricting campaign, drawing accusations of political bias and fueling calls for a boycott. The donation underscores the growing influence of wealthy donors in shaping electoral maps, as California becomes a focal point in national partisan battles.

Hastings, a long-time Democratic ally, has consistently backed Newsom’s initiatives, including a 2021 effort to block a recall attempt that cost $3 million. His latest contribution aims to advance a redistricting plan designed to weaken Republican representation in the state’s House delegation ahead of next year’s midterms. The campaign for Proposition 50, which will be decided in a Nov. 4 special election, has seen millions poured into both sides, with figures like Silicon Valley venture capitalist Ron Conway and independent donor Charles Munger Jr. also playing significant roles.

Amid the controversy, some viewers have announced they are canceling Netflix subscriptions, citing ethical concerns over the company’s political affiliations. Meanwhile, unverified reports of a $13.5 million deal between Netflix and comedian Stephen Colbert have circulated online, though no official confirmation has been provided. The claims, reportedly spread by outlets like News Hour, have been dismissed as false by industry insiders.

The backlash highlights growing tensions over corporate involvement in political processes, with critics arguing that such donations undermine democratic fairness. As the debate intensifies, Netflix’s role in the redistricting fight remains a contentious issue for its audience.