Ok folks, I have sat on this story for three days now because I have been digging into it and researching and did not want to publish this prematurely. I still have more questions than answers, but I think we have to at least ask this question now: Was Charlie Kirk’s neck wound we all saw and the gushing blood an entrance wound or an exit wound? Yes, at least until you start digging in and then you realize there seems to be perhaps more evidence for it being an exit wound than for the narrative we have all been fed. I’ll show you and then I’ll let YOU decide what you think… and we can all keep researching this together.

I’ll start with my friend Mike Adams, who asks this very respectful question, pointing out that a 30-06 rifle would leave a huge exit wound and almost certainly blood all over the back white wall. And yet… we don’t have either of those things:
“Don’t mean to be graphic, and I mean no disrespect to Charlie Kirk and his tragic assassination, but shouldn’t we be asking why there doesn’t appear to be an exit wound and blood splatter on the large white banner directly behind Charlie when he was shot? If the shot came from…”, a statement that raises doubts about the official account.

Another perspective highlights the absence of blood on the back wall, noting that within 15 minutes the rear camera is dismounted and taken away, not by authorities. Workers are pressed up against the very spot where their boss’s blood would have splattered during the assassination. They’re not looking at it. Not cautious. Not even wary. This is literally the crime scene immediately after a political assassination.

Further analysis suggests that Charlie was shot close up, from his right side, with the exit wound visible on the front left side of the neck. Some argue the shooter was not on the roof but positioned near the outside staircase. A video shows the bullet entering above his right ear and exiting through his neck, with the camera directly over his head removed shortly after the incident.

Questions persist about why no footage from this camera has been released. One individual states they are 99% certain it is an exit wound and that the camera’s footage could provide critical evidence. Meanwhile, construction work begins at the crime scene, raising concerns about the haste to erase traces of the event.

Eyewitness accounts also come under scrutiny, with reports of security personnel silencing witnesses immediately after the shooting. The narrative surrounding the assassination remains shrouded in inconsistencies, leaving many to question what truly transpired.