A controversial article claims a feminist publication orchestrated a curse on conservative figure Charlie Kirk days before his death, sparking debates over spiritual warfare and political motives. The piece details how an unnamed journalist reportedly paid multiple self-proclaimed witches on Etsy to cast spells targeting Kirk, alleging the ritual was meant to silence him for his “regressive rhetoric.”

The article, later accompanied by a disclaimer condemning the assassination, describes the reporter’s unsettling justification: “It is unethical to let him keep talking,” despite acknowledging the ethical dilemma of cursing an individual. The witches allegedly used Kirk’s birth date and a photograph of him set ablaze during the ritual, with one claiming the spell “was successful.”

The text further links the event to biblical themes, drawing parallels between modern spiritual conflicts and ancient figures like Jezebel, a queen associated with witchcraft in religious texts. It suggests the assassination may have been influenced by “demonic forces” and ties the act to broader cultural shifts, including the rise of occult practices and political tensions.

The narrative also references other alleged supernatural interventions, such as spells cast against former President Donald Trump, though these claims lack empirical evidence. Religious figures are cited warning about the risks of engaging with witchcraft, emphasizing its potential to “open the door for demonic forces.”

While the article presents these assertions as part of a spiritual struggle, it avoids concrete proof, relying instead on anecdotal accounts and symbolic interpretations. The connection between the alleged curses and Kirk’s death remains unverified, leaving the story in the realm of speculation and conspiracy theories.